|
Chelsea
City Charter Consensus
Process
Office of the Receiver
Massachusetts Executive
Office of Administration
and Finance
Consensus
process to create a new
city charter and governance
structure for the City
of Chelsea, Massachusetts,
which was under state
receivership
Susan
Podziba & Associates
created a multi-layered
public consensus building
process to enable Chelsea
residents to develop a
new charter to begin a
new chapter in the history
of the City of Chelsea,
Mass. The process, which
resulted in a voter-ratified
charter, created innovative
opportunities for citizens
to engage in local decision-making
and self-governance.
The City
of Chelsea was required
to create a new charter
after the State of Massachusetts
suspended all activities
of its elected bodies
because of fiscal mismanagement
and corruption. Due to
the breakdown in the local
democracy, few citizens
participated in city government.
The Office of the Receiver
retained SP&A to design
and implement a consensus
process to reach deep
into the community to
involve residents in creating
the new charter.
SP&A
provided multiple opportunities
for members of the public
to contribute to the creation
of the city’s governing
framework. Community members
nominated representatives
for the Chelsea Charter
Preparation Team (the
Team) through interviews,
facilitated meetings,
cable television shows,
and a charter hotline.
SP&A trained residents
to facilitate community
meetings where participants
discussed their good governance
ideals as related to the
city charter. During the
six months of Team meetings,
citizens throughout Chelsea
learned of and responded
to their deliberations
via newsletters in English
and Spanish, call-in public
television shows, a hotline,
a survey, and facilitated
meetings at local clubs,
centers, and places of
worship. The facilitators
later ran a second round
of community meetings
to obtained feedback on
specific elements of the
draft charter.
These communication
channels enabled the city’s
residents to inform the
Team’s discussions
and to shape the city
charter. The Team incorporated
the public’s comments
into the final version
of the Chelsea City Charter,
which was subsequently
ratified by a significant
majority of Chelseans
through a special election.
The Chelsea
Charter Consensus Process
marked a fundamental change
in Chelsea citizens’
relationship with their
city government. Under
the new charter, new elections
for city posts attracted
a wide range of diverse
candidates and produced
new city leadership. Within
five years, Chelseans
had transformed their
virtually bankrupt city
and failed democracy into
a vibrant, stable, and
growing city, which received
the prestigious All American
City Award from the National
Civic League as well as
a flow of private investment
dollars.
Press
on Chelsea Charter Consensus
Process
Kettering
Foundation case study
on Chelsea Charter Consensus
Process (pdf)
Chelsea
Charter Consensus Process
Map (pdf)
|